Perspectives
THE SCENE
Market dips notwithstanding, hedge fund czars
still don’t give enough of their winnings away
Two years ago, I wrote a book, 740 Park,
that ended with a challenge to Stephen A. Schwarzman, chairman of The
Blackstone Group.
Five years prior, he’d bought the best
apartment in a famous Manhattan building, 740 Park Avenue. The
apartment had previously belonged to John D. Rockefeller, Jr., probably
the world’s greatest-ever philanthropist, and more recently, to Saul P.
Steinberg, the Icarus of finance, whose fall from grace let Schwarzman
snatch his real estate trophy. It was a bold move that signaled
Schwarzman’s intention to raise his profile in New York’s linked worlds
of business and society.
If anything,
though, Schwarzman has become too successful — and yes, there is such a
thing. At the end of the book, I invited him — challenged him, really —
to take Rockefeller, not Steinberg, as his role model, and start giving
money away to those in need. Instead, Schwarzman has kept accumulating,
pulling off the largest corporate buyout ever — the $39 billion
takeover of Equity Office Properties in February 2007. Simultaneously,
he went on a public spending spree that culminated with a little 60th
birthday party — for himself. Can he
be blamed, nay, forgiven, for spending some $3 million to rent the
Seventh Regiment Armory on Park Avenue, serve lobster and Chassagne
Montrachet to some 350, and hire Martin Short, Rod Stewart, Marvin
Hamlisch, Patti La-Belle, and the Abyssinian Baptist Church Choir to
entertain him and his guests? Can you
forgive others if Schwarzman reminds folks of Saul Steinberg (or worse,
Dennis Kozlowski), whose penchant for hosting over-the-top parties
signaled the beginning of the end of the 1980s Greed Decade?Then,
oops, Schwarzman did it again, when he announced the Blackstone IPO,
and his colleagues in private equity and hedge funds began worrying
that he was dangerous and would cast unwelcome light on all private
equity hedgies and newbienouveaux riches (which is, of course, exactly
what happened). Schwarzman and Blackstone cofounder Peter G. Peterson
sold a combined $2.56 billion worth of shares of Blackstone to the
public (an ironic twist for a private equity company), and walked off
with a cool $677 million while holding onto a 23 percent stake worth
another $7.7 billion, and, in the process, set off a tsunami of
Schadenschwarzmanfreude. The eyes of
the world were on all those hedgies yet again in August, when Iowa
Senator Chuck Grassley introduced a bill to close a tax loophole that’s
helped create this new class of hedgie uberwealth, a loophole that let
most of the hedge kings’ income to be taxed at 15 percent, instead of
the 35 percent that most of the rest of us pay. Grassley
— the charity watchdog in Congress — had gotten irked by what has been
the best advertisement extant for hedgies, the Robin Hood Foundation.
Turns out that a big chunk of its funds — a so-called “rainy day fund”
of some $144.5 million — is being invested in hedge funds controlled by
the very merry men of Robin Hood’s board, and that they were collecting
typical industry fees (2 percent of assets plus 20 percent of profits)
for managing that money. “I don’t remember Robin Hood keeping 2 and 20
as his cut,” Grassley said of the deal. Now,
don’t get me wrong; I have nothing but respect for a nonprofit
foundation that can raise $72 million in a single night for the poor
and the uneducated, as the Robin Hood Foundation did at its last mega gala in May. But
in the current Gordon Gekko 2.0 climate, it’s painfully obvious that
$72 million is just a drop in the bucket for most of these guys — not
even 9 percent of what just one of these hedgies, ESL Investments CEO
Eddie Lampert, took home last year. Schwarzman, the prince in this
bucolic forest of riches, personally took home nearly $400 million —
but once again, he has given almost none of it away to charity. Perhaps
to get him started in that noble pursuit, the venerable New York Public
Library chose to honor him at its annual corporate dinner in June —
prompting the usually businessman-friendly New York Sun to pointedly
note that Schwarzman’s name appears nowhere on the Chronicle of
Philanthropy’s list of the 61 most generous givers. Nor is it on
BusinessWeek’s Top 50 Most Generous. And it’s no wonder: the 2006 tax
return for his Schwarzman Charitable Foundation shows five-figure
assets of only $63,424 and notes that only $991 of that is being held
for charitable purposes. C’mon,
folks. Imagine if Schwarzman had started doing what the Rockefellers
and Carnegies had done before him, and tithed even a small but
significant portion of his wealth regularly to charity. Imagine, too,
if Schwarzman had said aloud, repeatedly, that he was seeking to set a
good example, like Alan “Ace” Greenberg, former chairman of Bear
Stearns, who required employees to make charitable donations. Sure,
David Rockefeller is only number 107 on the current Forbes 400.
(Schwarzman, despite his paper losses in the billions from the
Blackstone deal, was ranked number 73 — and is expected to rise like a
rocket from that berth on next year’s list.) That
challenge I issued two years ago? It still stands, Mr. Schwarzman.
You’ve proven you can bring home the bacon better than anyone else
right now. But so what? When are you and your colleagues going to start
spreading around more of the pork?
Michael Gross, the author of 740 Park: The Story of the World’s Richest Apartment Building, is a regular columnist for CONTRIBUTE. Michael Witte is the illustrator of the grahic that accompanies this article.
Comments? Send an e-mail to editors@contributemedia.com.